oe. AE. . oo oe
ASN DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
2 Fy qe ¥A
antes
if
ite = BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
im
Th
DIC
Decket No. NR3974-14
13 Jan 15
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
_ deceased father’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC
1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
12 January 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased father’s
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In
addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC
memo dated 29 October 2014, a copy of which was provided to you on 21
November 2014, and is being provided to you now.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date ‘of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Docket No. NR3974-14
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
ROBERT J. O'NEILL {
Executive Director
Enclosure: NPC Memo dtd 29 Oct 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR059 15
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, ‘sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 March 2015. Additionally, the Board considered your response to the Advisory Opinion dated 24 February 2015. : After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5773 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3321 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC (memo. NR3321-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6093 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR6093-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3411 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased former husband's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Decket No, NR3411-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4625 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in Docket NOo.NKU4S62b~-14 this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8578-13
application for correction Of - your naval record pursuant | to ‘the. provisions of 10 usc L5S20° A three-member panel Of “the ‘Board for Correction of Naval “Records, sitting in executive session, considered ‘your —. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3450 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 5420 MMEA dated 4 August 2014, a copy of which is attached. NR3450-14 ay 4 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to iemanieaee the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3452 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record: and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making 4ts...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR760 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 September 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo dated 29 July 2014, a copy of whic is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to) demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.